首页> 外文OA文献 >Disability and pain after cortisone versus placebo injection for trapeziometacarpal arthrosis and de Quervain syndrome
【2h】

Disability and pain after cortisone versus placebo injection for trapeziometacarpal arthrosis and de Quervain syndrome

机译:可的松与安慰剂注射后的致残性和疼痛,伴有梯形掌骨关节炎和德Quervain综合征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study tested the null hypothesis that type of injection (corticosteroid vs. placebo) is not a predictor of arm-specific disability as measured with the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire 1 to 3 months after injection of dexamethasone or placebo for treatment of trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis or de Quervain syndrome. Secondly, we tested if type of injection was a predictor of pain intensity. Thirty-six English-speaking adults with TMC arthrosis or de Quervain syndrome were randomized for a dexamethasone or a placebo injection. At time of the injection, patients completed a demographic data sheet and validated questionnaires assessing arm-specific disability, pain intensity, depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, and patient's health-related beliefs. At an average of 1.4 ± 0.42 months (range, 0.79-2.5 months) after the injection, patients completed questionnaires regarding arm-specific disability, pain, and treatment satisfaction. Grip and pinch strength measurements were measured at both time points. Bivariable and multivariable analyses assessed predictors of arm-specific disability and pain intensity at follow-up. Type of injection was not a predictor of arm-specific disability or pain intensity 1 to 3 months after injection. The best model both for arm-specific disability and pain intensity at follow-up included pain catastrophizing and explained 18 % and 33 % of the variability, respectively. Catastrophic thinking was a better predictor of both of arm-specific disability and pain intensity than diagnosis or type of injection (steroid vs. placebo) 1to 3 months after an injection
机译:这项研究检验了零假设,即注射地塞米松或安慰剂治疗1-3个月后,根据手臂,肩膀和手部残疾问卷调查,注射类型(皮质类固醇vs安慰剂)不能预测手臂特异性残疾。梯形腕掌关节(TMC)或de Quervain综合征。其次,我们测试了注射类型是否是疼痛强度的预测指标。将三十六名患有TMC关节炎或德Quervain综合征的英语成人随机分配地塞米松或安慰剂注射液。在注射时,患者填写了人口统计学数据表并通过了有效的问卷调查,评估了特定于手臂的残疾,疼痛强度,抑郁症状,疼痛灾难性疾病以及患者的健康相关信念。病人平均在注射后1.4±0.42个月(0.79-2.5个月)内完成有关手臂特定残疾,疼痛和治疗满意度的问卷调查。在两个时间点测量握力和捏力强度。双变量和多变量分析评估了随访时手臂特异性残疾和疼痛强度的预测因子。注射类型不能预示注射后1至3个月的手臂特异性残疾或疼痛强度。手臂特异性残疾和随访时疼痛强度的最佳模型包括疼痛的灾难性变化,分别解释了18%和33%的变异性。灾难性思维比注射后1到3个月的诊断或注射类型(类固醇与安慰剂)更好地预测了特定于手臂的残疾和疼痛强度

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号